Tuesday, 28 September 2010

Sodomy 11 trial is damaging to Malaysia

Anwar Sodomy Trial is Fundamentally Wrong

|

Channel News Asia

Malaysia is wooing British tycoon Sir Richard Branson to be part of the country's multi-billion-dollar economic transformation programme.


The founder of the Virgin Group is positive about Malaysia's investment outlook. But he said the ongoing sodomy trial of opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim is damaging the country's reputation.

Sir Richard Branson has a huge following in Malaysia. To many young entrepreneurs, the 60-year-old tycoon is an inspiration, which was why they paid top dollar to attend his session at a conference on alternative investments in Kuala Lumpur.

The Malaysian government, which recently launched its 10-year economic transformation programme, hopes the Virgin empire Sir Richard Branson founded will also look to invest in the country.
Dr Jalilah Baba, director general of Malaysian Investment Development Authority, said: "We would like to work with him on a few programmes to attract investments here, either his direct investments or in terms of funding or in terms of technology."

Already, Sir Richard Branson is talking about opening up hotels in major cities in Asia under the Virgin brand.
He said: "We are going to try to create Virgin city hotels, very much in the spirit of Virgin. I am sure we will be doing some in this region."

The tycoon also called on the Malaysian government to take bold steps to liberalise its economy, with the government cutting back its role in order to stay competitive in the global market.

Sir Richard Branson is also positive about Malaysia's investment outlook. But he added that the sodomy trial of Anwar is doing the country a disservice.
He said: "I hope the case gets dropped. The case is fundamentally wrong and it does not make Malaysia look good in the world map.''

The authorities have downplayed his remark, saying it is his personal opinion. They added that Malaysia is committed to political and economic liberalisation.

Dr Jalilah Baba said: ''In order to comment (on) whether you should drop it (the Anwar case) or not, you should know all the facts of the matter, you should study all the facts of the matter.''

Judge rapped overzealous prosecutors

Judge critical of prosecutors in Anna Nicole trial

September 28, 2010
Defendants Howard K. Stern (left), Dr. Khristine Eroshevich (centre) and Dr. Sandeep Kapoor are shown in a combination photo during their arraignment at the Los Angeles County Criminal Courts building in Los Angeles, California, in this May 13, 2009 file photo. - Reuters pic
LOS ANGELES, Sept 28 — The judge in the Anna Nicole Smith drug trial slammed prosecutors yesterday for their aggressive pursuit of convictions against three people accused of plying the actress with prescription drugs before her 2007 death. Earlier yesterday, both sides rested their cases after a nearly two-month trial that saw prosecutors bring numerous witnesses whose testimony defence attorneys largely sought to discredit. All three defendants have pleaded not guilty.
Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Robert Perry characterised the case as a “kitchen-sink prosecution” in which numerous claims and evidence are put forth “against these defendants in the hope that something survives.”
The judge’s comments came as he considered dismissing or reducing some of the charges against the realty TV star’s one-time boyfriend and lawyer, Howard K. Stern, and two of her doctors, Khristine Eroshevich and Sandeep Kapoor.
Closing arguments are set to begin Thursday and jury deliberations may start early next week.
Prosecutors allege Stern, Eroshevich and Kapoor conspired to funnel prescription drugs to a known addict, Smith, who died in February 2007 in Florida from an accidental drug overdose at age 39. They are not charged with directly causing her death.
Still, Perry’s comments seem to underpin weeks of reports that prosecutors were having a difficult time proving their case. The judge said yesterday that many of the charges should have been misdemeanors, as opposed to the felonies that carry higher penalties.
“The prosecution had a dead celebrity and a lot of low-level misdemeanors” from which they tried to build a case for more serious crimes, Perry said.
But Deputy District Attorney Sean Carney defended prosecutors by saying their two-year investigation convinced them that felonies had been committed.
For much of the afternoon, lawyers discussed the meaning of words like “addict,” “addiction” and “pain” that the judge will use when instructing the jury on deliberations.
Prosecutors have argued that the defendants unlawfully prescribed or obtained controlled substances that fuelled Smith’s addiction over a three-year period when she was known to be a drug addict.
Defence attorneys have countered that Smith was not an addict, but was a sufferer of chronic pain since 2000. She also battled anxiety, depression and lack of sleep. — Reuters

Sunday, 26 September 2010

Deccan Chronicle covers Sosilawati murder

Sept. 22: Malaysia’s deadliest crime story in recent times has a Chennai link. Allal Kathan Muthuraja was a film financier living with his pretty wife Usha Rani and three-year-old daughter Lakshmi Shri at Ramapuram close to where a good many of Kollywood personalities live. It’s a rented house and that’s just one little aspect amid the many strange things popping off the cupboard of the 37-year-old handsome man hailing from Shengottai in Tirunelveli district.
While the wife claims that Muthuraja has been a film financier, not many in the film industry seem to know the man. A more serious question arising out of the Muthuraja case is why did Usha Rani keep mum all this time though the husband disappeared after leaving for Malaysia in January on being called by his long-time friends and business associates Surendar and Padmanabhan, lawyer-brothers living in Selangor in that country?
Why did she have to wait till the two Malaysians were arrested by the police there, suspected of murdering over 15 persons? Until their arrest, the brothers were enjoying great respect among the locals but things changed quickly for them when they allegedly killed businesswoman Sosilawati Lawiya and her three associates. These victims had gone missing on August 30 after visiting the brothers’ farmhouse to discuss a property deal.
Sources say that Usha Rani had been in touch with the brothers from January. However, she has claimed in her many media interviews — local Tamil news channels fed gregariously on the story of ‘millionaire’ Muthuraja missing in Malaysia — that she was knocking on all doors in Malaysia to get information about her missing husband.
She had contacted the Indian high commission in Malaysia, complained to the Interpol and the Malaysian police, but none helped. In the same breath, she also claimed that Surendar and Padmabhan avoided her calls. It's big mystery why the wife did not press her case strongly with the Malaysian police by telling them that Muthuraja went missing only after his trip to meet the brothers?
Usha Rani claimed that she paid `5 lakh to a man called Suresh, who claimed he was from the Malaysian police and demanded a bribe of `10 lakh to let her speak to her husband, who was in his custody for carrying two kilos of Ketamine. He was then in a car with a few blacks outside the Beach Club Hotel, Suresh told her. She had arranged the part-payment of `5 lakh through a ‘friend’ in Malaysia. She would not name that friend. In any case, there was no phone talk and she was not sure whether Suresh was really a cop and her husband was anywhere around there.
Now, Muthuraja has a brother Kasi Viswanathan working in Russia and he decided to go to Malaysia looking for him in May. The lawyer-brothers went along with him to the police to lodge a complaint about Muthuraja missing but they withdrew that complaint after Kasi left the place.
Strangely, the brothers handed over Muthuraja’s suitcase to Kasi, saying that the man had left it in the hotel while telling them he was going out and would soon be back. He never returned, Kasi was told.
He brought the suitcase to Chennai and handed it over Usha before returning to Russia. When Usha Rani obliged the TV cameras for visuals of the contents of the suitcase delivered to her at the Chennai home, there were several sets of brand new dresses. But then, didn’t she tell the media earlier that Muthuraja had gone to meet the lawyer-brothers on a one-day trip?
On Tuesday, she took the flight to Malaysia to continue her search for the husband, leaving the little daughter in the care of a maidservant she picked up just the previous day through ‘Just Dial’.
Malaysian media reported that she visited the lawyers' farmhouse along with a friend S. Manikavasagam, a local MP and later they also met some senior police officials.
The media also quoted the MP saying that he would not want to disclose where his Chennai guest lived because he feared for her safety. But that was before the Malaysian police announced, on Wednesday, that Muthuraja’s case was no more that of a man missing but one of murder.
The suspense of the missing Muthuraja might have ended but the mystery behind the murder remains buried deep, may not be necessarily in that farm stream.

Fraud invested society

Why is everyone so shocked about the match fixing scandal involving Pakistani cricketers? How often in the recent past have we all wondered whether cricket is being played genuinely? Many of the losses are dubious. No evidence, so we let it pass.
Sadly scams and frauds have become a part of everyday life. There’s the Common Wealth Games mess, judges in Andhra Pradesh were recently caught cheating during an exam, doctors are being accused of conducting unnecessary surgeries to earn some extra moolah, seven out of 10 businessmen in general are alleged to be involved in some fraud, there are scams in the abode of Lord Venkateshwara in Tirupati and let’s not even go into the political scams. From Madhu Koda to Telecom Minister A Raja, the Galli brothers in Karnataka and many more political biggies, nobody seems to be aboveboard or on the right side of the law.
Even Pakistan’s President, Asif Ali Zardari, who is appalled at his players’ behaviour, is no saint. Jemima Khan aptly tweeted “Pakistan’s President (formerly Mr 10%, now Mr 110%) is hardly the role model the country needs. Life ban for him too would help.”
While everyone is after the three tainted Pakistan cricketers, who are very small fries when compared to the bigger scamsters, what action is being taken against those involved in the CWG mess (said to be around Rs 3,500 crores) and other frauds?
Even at a social level, earlier, nobody knew anyone who went to jail and people kept away from dodgy men and women. Today, the social scene is full of shady characters. Nobody knows what their business is, source of income is and yet, if they are cool, we all love hanging out with them.
Sarah, Duchess of York lives well because her daughters support her from their trust funds and ex-husband Prince Andrew continues to let her live at his home. Yet, she didn’t blink before agreeing to introduce him to any shady individual as long as she was paid a hefty price. Luckily for her, even after being exposed in a sting operation, she is not considered a social pariah.
Ditto drugs. They are no longer the vices of a troubled soul. Paris Hilton was caught with cocaine, and this is not the first time she’s had a brush with the law, yet she innocently says “she thought it was gum.”
Society has become rather accepting of wrongdoers. As long as the means justify the ends, nobody is bothered about bending, twisting or even breaking the rules.
Mohammad Azharudin was punished with a life ban in cricket for his involvement in match fixing, but now is a MP. Bill Clinton was forgiven for the Monica Lewinsky scandal and he didn’t want to sit on judgement either about his son-in-law’s father being a convicted fraudster with 33 counts of fraud to his name.
And Italy’s Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi continues to be in power though he has been involved in various sex scandals.
If you are wondering how society has become so forgiving, social scientist Beena Thomas explains, “Society has always been like this. Earlier there were no sting operations, technology or extensive media coverage, so people got away. Today we live in an exposed society where indiscretions come to light more frequently.”
Even when crimes come to light, the real culprits aren’t always taken to task. In Pakistan, instead of the accused players, poor donkeys were being pelted with shoes and rotten tomatoes. Ok, the players haven’t been forgiven, but it looks like they are just being made the scapegoats. Nobody is interested in dwelling deeper into the issue and busting the bookie nexus.
Does this mean it’s okay to live on the wrong side of the law? No, says Prof Daniel, “You are king till you get caught.” After that nobody wants to know you.
For a few tainted politicians who get away, there are people like Satyam Computer’s former Chairman B. Ramalinga Raju who end up losing everything. Pakistani fast bowler Moha-mmad Amir, at 18, faces having to see his promising career end in disgrace. Madhu Koda is rotting in jail. And for every Azhar who has rebuilt his life is a Hansie Cronje, who became a social outcast in South Africa.
Once everything is taken away from you, don’t expect people to be nice as author Wilbur Smith famously warned his readers against associating with losers as losing is contagious.

 

Latest Comments

If India had any sense of history of what UK has done to our forefathers, we would not have been in the Commonwealth, leave alone the hosting of the Commonwealth Games. The racist Christian British rule from 1757 to 1947 had killed 1.8 billion Indians. This British Indian Holocaust of 1.8 billion excess deaths commenced with the Great Bengal Famine in 1769 to 1779 that resulted in 10 million deaths. Ten million Indians were killed in post 1857 First War of Independence or known as Indian Mutiny reprisals. One million Indians were starved and murdered by the Christian British between 1895 to 1897 in the Indian Famine. Six to 9 million starved in the Indian famine between 1899 to 1900. This Christian killing of Indians concluded with the WW2 1943 to 1945 Bengal holocaust or artificial famine in which 7 million Indians were starved under Churchill. Churchill acknowledged the crucial importance of maintaining Hindu Muslim antipathy to preserve British rule. Churchill inspired Indian Partition which resulted in 1 million dead Indians and 18 million Muslim and Hindu refugees. The man-made global warming in which the West and the US are major climate criminals and this is going to cause a climate genocide. As per top UK climate scientist Professor James Lovelock FRS, the Climate Genocide will leave only 500 million mostly European survivors by the end of the century. There is an ongoing Muslim Holocaust that is simply ignored by the West. This post-1950 avoidable deaths or excess deaths, deaths that did not have to happen, total 1.3 billion for the whole World. Of this 1.2 billion is in the non-European World. The avoidable death or excess death in the muslim world is 0.6 billion. These estimates being consonant with estimates of post-1950 under-5 year old infant deaths of all over the world that totals 0.88 billion. Of this infant death, 0.85 billion is in the non-European World. In the Muslim world this infant death is 0.4 billion. 16 million people die avoidably each year in non European world and of this half are Muslims due to the Western policies.
I guess lot of educated Indians think and talk about corruption, malpractice, sheer greediness prevalent in our selfish hypocritic society. Well I anticipated action since the time I was born, atleast from the so called elite of our society. Seems like a bunch of educated Indians can only do as much as take competetive exams and improve their own lives outside of India or with well paid jobs within India. "To be is to do" is a thought I believe in and one that would take us further as a respectable humane society. Media will decry all the wrong actions, yet bigger issues will pass us by and no action will ever be taken. I believe, even if the 5% of the modern society decided to change the spate of country, these issues will be things of past. It took one man getting slapped on a train in foreign land to eventually free his own nation from British rule.
As long as there is no political will nothing changes. It is mob politics that is ruling this very functionally illiterate country. We, those who want to see the change, are a minority. It is the fear and the respect for the rule of the law that will bring about any change in our country. Unhindered enforcement is very important. What is the motivation for these corrupt politicians to bring about any change?
There is a feeling of schadenfreude in India about the fraud allegations against Pakistani cricketers. The entire media is trying to paint Pakistan as a purely fraudulent society. Which it might be. But trying to think that India is a completely straight forward society is indulging in delusion. India has more than its fair share of scamsters, utterly corrupt politicians, match-fixing bookies, crooks of every shade. Some day these scamsters are going to bring India the same ignominy and we will have nowhere to hide our faces. The CWG scams are just one cog in this entire wheel of cheating and deceit in India.
Corruption has become the norm of everyday life. People have started accepting this and they are not finding a problem with it. If ever it has to change it should start with each one of us. I always dream of living in a corrupt free society but I cannot envision our society moving in that direction. If I would even try to stay away from it I might be considered an outcast. Looking ahead I would be very happy if at least the common man wouldn't get affected. It is our very nature of not being satisfied with what we have and to earn a quick buck without much effort the reasons for this widespread social disease. Being a practical citizen and having lived in this part of the world for a significant part of my life I cannot imagine this epidemic spiraling south in my life time. But I always hope and wish that I live in a more corrupt free society.
Talk about corruption in Indian politics and administration too. Today if you have gone to prison because of corruption it is a qualification to be in politics and not a bar. During the independence struggle, people went to prison fighting for freedom and they became great politicians. Today most of the ignorant still think that going to prison is needed to compete for politics. Anyway, it is time for people in office to turn from their selfish needs and work for the benefit of others. Don't offer bribes, don't pay bribes and don't accept bribes. That should be the message for all Indians if you want to uplift the country.
www.deccanchronicle.com

PKR is tarnished

Thursday, September 23, 2010

Azmin vs Zaid, the tussles that tarnished PKR

The recent ongoing tussles in PKR have all but tarnished PKR's reputation
Firstly, the 12 local leaders who are aligned to Jeffrey Kittingan were all hauled up by the disciplinary board and and some punished for their attempt a year ago to form a new party, although there was a peace deal between them and the other PKR leaders
Then right after what was dubbed “the just decision” decided by the disciplinary committee, an alleged smear campaign against Zaid Ibrahim surfaced, with allegations such as “traitor” and “greenhorn” thrown at him to tarnish his reputation and credibility in the eyes of PKR members.
Around the same time a sudden press conference was called, and attended by various strong PKR leaders in the PKR headquarters. This was done to
demonstrate their endorsement and support on Azmin Ali, even though some leaders who attended this meeting claimed that they were not aware of the purpose of this press conference.

Azmin Ali
These occurred without Azmin himself indicating or declaring first that he is contesting for the vice deputy presidency. Were all these events intentional? Or is it done voluntarily by other quarters of the party without Azmin nor Zaid directing it?
If one were to doubt and noticed the “coincidental” events that came up one after another as above, he will find it hard to believe that either of the above’s camp, especially Azmin has no hands in it. Although we cannot say for sure that Azmin is involved, we also cannot deny the fact that these events tip the sentiments of the voters in his favour. In fact one can even suspect that his silence on his candidacy was intentional, so that the average members cannot pin point or blame the emergence of allegations and accusations on him as he did not (yet) declare his intention to contest.

Zaid Ibrahim
Nonetheless with the recent misinterpretation by FreeMalaysiaToday Azmin, instead of personally contacting "party member" Zaid to clarify what he said, took the opportunity to make a bold (but foolish) statement to the world, lambasting Zaid as arrogant for calling Syed Hussin “nyanyuk”. This action has surely confirmed Zaid’s entire allegation that there is an ongoing smear campaign against him. And now, without a doubt we can state with a high probability that it was Azmin who wants to discredit Zaid as much as he can, and it was his camp as well who were behind the smear campaigns.
I personally admire both Azmin Ali and Zaid Ibrahim as politicians. Azmin for his unwavering loyalty and persistence even when the tide did not favour PKR, and Zaid for his strong principles and good values that he showed when he was the Law Minister.
However that line of respect must be drawn when either one decides to go on a smear campaign to tarnish the reputation of another, or used underhand tactics to eliminate his competitor, or even attempt to encourage other leaders to declare support for him so as to woo the voters to his side. Simply put, a line must be drawn when the game of perception is not played fairly or with dignity and honesty.
Politics, as much as we want it to be based simply on ideology and strong beliefs, is a game of perception. How you influence the perception of the voters about you before any election will ultimately decide your fate. The candidates (including Zaid Ibrahim himself who tried to gain some support by comparing himself to the late Tun Ghafar Baba) are both trying to influence the perception of the members. And it is fine to do so.
It is fine to convince the voters to vote for you by telling them of your good points. In fact it is fine to highlight the weakness of the opponent as a politician. However, it is definitely not justified to throw allegations or embark on a campaign to simply tarnish the personal reputation of others without any basis or proved facts.
PKR preaches democracy and fairness. It was the leaders first who decided to have a direct election system for members to choose their leaders, for which many Malaysians commended. However, what is the use of having an election if it is not fair in the first place?
Top PKR leaders carry the responsibility of preserving and uplifting the image of the party. Leaders such as Azmin have unfortunately failed to do that. The entire episode so far has all but shattered the perception that PKR preaches justice and fairness. To many average Malaysians, the tussles clearly showed that PKR endorses old style politics where personal attacks and underhand tactics are legitimate tools to win an election. And that party unity and respect between member leaders are mere "slogans" to be sung upon whenever they need it.
Perhaps Zaid and Azmin should emulate the PKR Youth, who decided to engage on a healthy presidential style debate among the candidates. If PKR Youth can show such political maturity and understanding I cannot see why leaders vying for the No.2 spot cannot do so. The contest should not be about personality but about issues and ideas. Therefore a public debate such as these will certainly empower their members to decide on the best candidate to lead them as deputy president for the next General Election.
Hence, instead of publishing statements to the media undermining one or another, which in turn will give the BN controlled media the much needed ammunition to tarnish PKR’s reputation, Zaid and Azmin should face each other off in a healthy public and publicised debate.
This in turn will also be seen as a massive step up and a step ahead of other political parties in terms of political maturity. Credible leaders must be seen to walk the talk. There is no use in preaching about democracy and fairness if the fair and simple rule of not tarnishing the personal reputation of others during election is not adhered to.