Wednesday, 18 August 2010

MEMALI MASSACRE

Thursday, August 19, 2010


Memali - a democracy in rubbles

“In the absence of justice, what is sovereignty but organised robbery?”: Saint Agustine
Date: November 1985.
Place: Malaysia.
The Prime Minister was Mahathir Mohamad. Musa Hitam was the Deputy Prime Minister and Home Minister.
Malaysia was going through a bad recession. The price of its 2 main natural resources, tin and rubber, was at rock bottom.
The Mahathir-induced “look east policy” was not working to Malaysia’s advantage. All it managed to do was to invite Japanese and South Korean contractors to undertake massive development works such as the then ground breaking Dayabumi project. Little else was being achieved from the policy apart from the mushrooming of Japanese restaurants around town.
“Privatisation” and “sogo sosha” were the in-words at this time. On the other hand, the policy only managed to isolate Malaysia from its customary ally, the Great Britain and consequently, the United States.
Economically, Malaysia was struggling. Nothing was happening. Graduates, local and from abroad, were finding it hard to find jobs. In order to help the graduates, a “graduates scheme” was implemented where graduates were assigned jobs as clerks and junior executives in the civil service and government agencies circa 1986. Things were bleak.
Mahathir Mohamad had managed to consolidate his power base by winning the general election in 1982 after a “power transition” - which UMNO is so well known for – from Tun Hussein Onn. He appointed Musa Hitam as Deputy Prime Minister, a pairing that was so glorified as the “MM” leadership. Both of them were even presented with a motor bike each bearing registration number MM 1 and MM 2 respectively.
It looked like a pairing made in heaven. Although history would later show that Mahathir Mohamad’s political marriages would never stand the test of time, for various reasons which could only best be described as Mahathir-esque.
Elsewhere, something earth shaking and of more sinister nature, was brewing.
In 1979, the Shah of Iran left Iran under cover of darkness leaving Shapour Bakhtiar, his Prime Minister, to fend off the Islamic fundamentalist with the help of the Supreme Army Councils. The exiled Ayatollah Khomeini - whose preaching and sermons were smuggled into Iran in cassettes tapes – came back to Iran on February 1 1979.
On April Fool’s day that year, after a referendum in which only one choice was offered - Islamic Republic: yes or no – saw a landslide vote for the Islamic Republic, Khomeini declared Iran as an Islamic Republic with a brand new constitution. The Iranian Revolution was thus complete.
Nobody in Malaysia - not even Mahathir Mohamad - gave 2 sens to the Iranian Revolution and the effect it would have on the world in general and on Malaysia specifically. The truth was that the Iranian Revolution would be the catalyst for Islamist revivalism all around the world.
Soon, its effect swept throughout the world, the wind of Islamist revivalism sweeping east through India, Afghanistan going downwards towards Malaysia, Singapore and Indonesia. To the west, it blew through Turkey, Europe and crossed the big pond to the United States of America without even being noticed nor realised.
In Malaysia, the Islamist revivalism saw the Islamist party, PAS, going on a fundamentalist rampage throughout Malaysia. This coincided with the return to Malaysia of firebrands such as Ustaz Abdul Hadi Awang, who would soon climb PAS’ power hierarchy on fundamentalist ticket. In the early 80s, PAS, taking advantage of the Islamist revivalism elsewhere throughout the world and with Iran as the central catalyst, embarked on a series of political assaults against UMNO and the Barisan government in such intensity as yet unseen.
In short, PAS’ agenda was to equate UMNO and Barisan Nasional with infidelity and a vote for UMNO or BN was a vote against Islam. Those who did that would be the enemy of Islam and would consequently go to hell. It was a simple message. It was as basic as it comes.
The mass media referred to this propaganda as the “kafir-mengkafir” (branding people as infidel) issue. The infamous “Amanat Hadi Awang” ( Hadi Awang’s Decree) was laid by Hadi Awang in 1981.[i] Loosely translated, Hadi decreed:
My brothers, believe me. We oppose UMNO not because its name is UMNO, we oppose the Barisan Nasional not because its name is Barisan Nasional. We oppose them because they continue with the Constitution of the colonial, continue with the regulations of the infidel, continue with the regulations of the ignorant. Because of that we struggle to fight them. Believe me brothers, our struggle is a divine struggle (jihad). Our speech is jihad, our donation is jihad and because we struggle against these groups, if we die in our fights, our death is martyrdom, our death is an Islamic death. We do not have to join the Jews, we do not have to profess Christianity, we do not have to profess Hinduism, we do not have to profess Buddhism, but we will be infidels if we say politic is a quarter and religion is a quarter.”
Hadi Awang was, and still is, a brilliant and fiery orator. His was a potent mixture of oratorical skills and political savvy-ness unashamedly laced with religious fervour. His audience were the farmers, the padi planters, the young Malay in the rural areas, the young impressionable university students and those who were unknowingly caught and swept away by Islamist revivalism. In other words, he appealed to the poor non-urbanites as well as the impressionable intellect who were tired of the Barisan Nasional’s policies and were looking for alternatives.
The Barisan Nasional, under Mahathir Mohamad, did not lack leadership. However, Mahathir was too much of a leader as much as he was a listener. Polemic was a dirty word. Dissent, political or otherwise, was even a dirtier word. As a result, it was a government which lacked any kind of intellectual input. It was a government which lacked any kind of opposite ideas which would provide the impetus for any counter-reactive steps when faced with political assaults based on rural popularism.
(The inability to deal with new and untested issues seem to be the BN's - and particularly UMNO's- real bogeyman. It continues till this very day. In 2008 GE for example, both the BN and UMNO were at a loss as to how to deal with the alternative media and the cyber world. At present, the BN and UMNO do not have a clue on how to deal with the people's grievances and wishes which are being aired daily. This is because their leadership tradition is not based on an orchestral-conductor  or same-level leadership but on a pyramid-feudal leadership, where the top only listens to the man directly below him.)
Thus, the Mahathir led government was at a loss on how to counter PAS in general and Hadi Awang in particular. The effect of the Islamist revivalism caused by the Iranian revolution was slowly, but very surely, sweeping the nation under Mahathir’s nose without him even sniffing it!
The government tried to counter the sudden revival of Islam by portraying itself as an Islamist government. The Barisan Nasional’s or more specifically, UMNO’s brand of Islam saw the emergence of the various Islamic authorities, Islamic school, Islamic attire and a more Islamic oriented civil service. Thus, where there were no female students wearing a tudung in school in 1979, the tudung became almost an identifying factor in the early 80’s. Efforts were made to show that UMNO was in fact a more Islamic party than PAS. And UMNO’s Islam is a better Islam than PAS’ Islam. That was the agenda.
However, the government’s efforts to “Islamise” the country as a counter-reaction to PAS’ populist political assaults has just resulted in PAS gaining more and more momentum in their political assaults. In Kedah for example, a village would have 2 mosques, one for UMNO’s supporters and another for PAS supporters. Families broke up just because the father was a PAS supporter and the son was an UMNO supporter. Marriage could not take place because the bride to be comes from an “UMNO family” and the groom comes from a “PAS family”. PAS supporters don’t attend a khenduri by an UMNO supporter and vice versa. Even the dead would not be prayed for by PAS supporters if he or she was an UMNO supporter! These were the scenes at the height of the kafir-mengkafir controversy.
In the universities, the full force of the Islamist revivalism, which translated itself into a war of political idealism slowly seeped into student politics. As a student who was active in student politics in the University of Malaya in the early 80’s, I went through hellish moments and countless confrontations with students who leaned more towards the PAS political ideologies. (There is no doubt that the development in the student movements, both locally and abroad, in the 80’s laid the premise for the current political climate in our country. I don’t think this is realised by the powers that be).
Hadi Awang and the PAS agenda were therefore left largely unchecked. On the social front, Islamist organisations, such as Al-Arqam, were gaining momentum, recruiting not only rural Malay folks but also young Malay intellects as members. The Mahathir led government was at a loss to deal with this sudden rise of a concept which was almost alien to this country. Suddenly, wearing a skirt was deemed anti-social in Malaysia. Going to work or school without a tudung was deemed immoral in Malaysia.
Memali was a sleepy little village near Baling, Kedah. Surrounded by rubber smallholdings, the villagers were mainly rubber tappers, odd jobbers and farmers. These were among the forgotten people of Malaysia. Ensconced within an impoverish surroundings, these were people who had never seen development. The benefits, if any, of the New Economics Policy only spread within a small circle of the Malay elites and the people of Memali were too far away from even the edge of that circle. They were the modern proletarians whose only concern was to find enough to eat and to survive on day in day out.
When hope was not a part of life, what else was there to look forward to, other than to hope for the best in the after world? In death, if one could go to heaven; bath in rivers of milk and surrounded by virgin nymphs, what wouldn’t one give to ensure such heavenly achievements? Thus it came as no surprise that PAS’ ideologies, encapsulated by Hadi Awang’s decree, won the hearts of the people of Memali. UMNO after all was the antithesis of life in Memali. UMNO was rich. UMNO was in the big towns. And of course, UMNO was infidel! And we fight them, we are on a divine struggle. And if we die, we are martyrs.
Ibrahim Mahmud was a graduate of the University of Tripoli (thus was his nick name, Ibrahim Libya). He also studied in Al-Azhar. When he came back, he even made some appearances on national television. But back in Memali he was an orator in the Hadi Awang’s mould. Fiery, enthralling, charismatic and full of religious fervour. Obviously, he jumped onto Hadi Awang’s martyrdom formula to gain his political mileage. And in Memali, where life was hard and mired in hopelessness, heavenly promises would be the only hope left. The people of Memali embraced the call for jihad and Ibrahim Mahmud aka Ibrahim Libya became a religious leader for whom the Memali people were ready to die in order to protect him from the neo-colonialist-imperialist-infidel UMNO led government.
The Mahathir led government meanwhile had no clue on how to deal with the likes of Ibrahim Libya. It branded him a criminal and set out to arrest him and detain him under the ISA. Just how various attempts to arrest and detain him failed is beyond my comprehension as the government has on numerous occasions shown that when it wanted to arrest or suppress the people, it would somehow succeed. On the 19th November 1985, after Subuh prayers (morning prayers), the police surrounded Ibrahim’s madrasah. When attempts to arrest him failed, the police fired guns and killed 14 villagers, including women and old folks. Most of them were rubber tappers, farmers and oddjobbers who were armed with parangs, spears and one or two hand guns. Four policemen also perished.
Memali is proof that the New Economic Policy doesn’t benefit the forgotten people of Malaysia. It is testimony that the politics of hatred, much more when the hatred is based on religious differences, would soon terminate in a colossal debacle. Memali is also about a government which had lost its plot, which had no idea how to deal with oppositions in a proper and democratic manner, in an area where it lacked clear ideals and plans. Never in the history of independent Malaysia has the might of physical power been so nonchalantly and casually executed on the helpless and weak. At the very least, the usage of brute power against the villagers was reckless, if not downright wrongful and illegal.
Memali is also proof that religious extremism is a time bomb waiting to explode. Religion as a political base and tool is a recipe for disaster. Because religions, to many people, demand blind faith. And blind faith does not require thinking or the process rationalisation. PAS and the late Ibrahim Libya were indeed playing with fire.
In true Mahathir fashion, Mahathir Mohamad sometimes later insinuated that he was not responsible for the Memali incident as he was abroad on 19th November 1985, when it happened. That also insinuated that Musa Hitam was responsible as he was then the Acting Prime Minsiter and Home Minister. Whatever it was, it was during the administration of the Barisan Nasional government, of which UMNO was the leading party, and of which Mahathir was the Chief, that the incident happened.
What does Ketuanan Melayu mean to the people of Memali, then and even now? What does the New Economics Policy (and now, the New Economics Model) mean to the people of Memali, then and even now? If the Judges who were wrongfully sacked and suspended by the Mahathir regime in 1988 could be paid a total of 10 million ringgit, perhaps the Memali people deserve even more.
At the end of the day, the victims were those who perished and the poor people of Memali. Malaysia was reduced to a state of disbelief.
Mahathir Mohamad. Musa Hitam. And the whole cabinet in 1985. Please visit Memali and feel the pain of the forgotten people of Malaysia. And if the Memali incident does not tickle even the edge of your conscience, you are perhaps a lesser human than you think you are.
Al-Fatihah to those who died in Memali on 19th November 1985.

[i] Saudara-saudara sekalian, Percayalah! Kita menentang UMNO bukan kerana nama dia UMNO, kita menentang Barisan Nasional, bukan kerana nama Barisan Nasional. Kita menentang dia kerana dia mengekalkan Perlembagaan penjajah, mengekalkan peraturan kafir, mengekalkan peraturan jahiliah. Oleh kerana itulah kita berjuang melawan mereka. Percayalah saudara, perjuangan kita adalah jihad, Ucapan kita adalah jihad, derma kita adalah jihad dan kerana kita berjuang dengan puak-puak ini, kalau kita mati kerana berlawan ini, mati kita adalah mati syahid, mati kita adalah mati Islam. Kita tidak payah masuk Yahudi, kita tidak payah masuk Kristian, kita tidak payah masuk Hindu, kita tidak payah masuk Buddha, tetapi kita menjadi kafir dengan mengatakan politik suku agama suku.” : Haji Hadi Awang, 1981.

Stop Politicising Defence Matters


Don't politicise defence issues, warns Ahmad Zahid

BAGAN DATOH: Defence Minister Ahmad Zahid Hamidi has called on politicians to stop politicising national defence issue.
"Although we may have differences in opinion, we should stick to the truth and not go to the extent of damaging the country's image, especially in matters concerning national defence," he told reporters here.

He was commenting on the police report lodged by the Royal Malaysian Navy at the Hulu Kelang police station two days ago against Lembah Pantai MP Nurul Izzah Anwar and Malay Mail reporter Marhalim Abas over the claims that the country's first submarine, KD Tunku Abdul Rahman, was unable to dive.

Speaking to reporters after attending the breaking of fast at the Sungai Keli Mosque here yesterday, Ahmad Zahid said Nurul Izzah's statement, published by Indonesia's Kompas newspaper on Aug 4, had undermined the country's image.

Describing the act as that of a "penderhaka" (traitor), Ahmad Zahid said the statement had damaged the country's image in the eyes of the world.

"As a member of parliament, she should have been more ethical. But the manner in which she disparages the Malaysian Armed Forces is utterly disgraceful," he said.

On the Malay Mail article, Ahmad Zahid said he had given his answer in Parliament explaining that the submarine could dive, otherwise "how was it possible for the submarine to voyage all the way from France to Sepanggar Bay in Sabah?"

The newspaper reported on July 7 that the submarine suffered a technical defect that prevented it from diving.

- Bernama

No to Operasi Lallang

Don't replay Operasi Lallang, PAS warns government

By FMT Staff

KUALA LUMPUR: PAS today issued a double warning to the BN government and its coalition partner the MCA: “Don’t play racial politics and don't use the ISA and replay Operasi Lalang."
The first salvo came from party deputy president Nasharuddin Mat Isa who urged MCA not to play racial politics.
“I'm warning MCA not to walk the narrow road of racial politics to garner support from the Chinese who are disillusioned with Barisan Nasional,” said Nasharuddin.
The warning comes in the wake of the recently concluded Malaysian Chinese Economic Congress organised by the MCA which urged the government to reduce bumiputera equity in the new economic model.
He said MCA’s move to support the resolution clearly proved that components within BN had failed to reach a consolidated consensus to rule the country following their failure to secure a 2/3 majority in the March 8, 2008 general election.
In contrast Pakatan Rakyat, he said had jointly agreed to hold firmly to the Pakatan policy which was signed by coalition partners – PAS, DAP and PKR – in December 2009.
Pakatan will preserve the special status of Malays and ensure the legitimate rights and interest of other races are protected as enshrined in article 153 of the Federal Constitution.
Meanwhile, party information chief Idris Ahmad reminded the government not to use the ISA as it did during Operasi Lalang when it came down on dissenting voices in a mass swoop.
He urged the federal administration to stay calm and not issue a blanket blacklist of the opposition because it wanted to protect BN from the internal strive gripping its component parties.

Malays were also immigrants


“Umno leaders must repent and understand that they are not only disliked by the Malays themselves but have also been rejected by the non-Malays, especially the educated and informed generation,” Idris told Harakahdaily yesterday.
Describing the current political scenario as 'heated', he said the situation arose because BN refused to accept the democratic decision of the rakyat.
Citing MCA president Chua Soi Lek’s call, during the congress, for the removal of the 30 percent bumiputera equity, Idris said he (Chua) had stoked the anger of deputy Umno president Muhyiddin Yassin.
“Muhyiddin’s anger was further fanned by other Umno leaders, Malay NGOs and certain media have been playing up these verbal assaults.
“PAS is worried that there will be a repeat of 1987, when Umno experienced a breakup with teams A and B until Umno was banned by the court.
"Suddenly out of the blue, you had deputy MCA president Lee Kim Sai saying Malays were also immigrants (pendatang) and their right questionable," he said.
Idris went on to recall that Umno leaders had called for a rally at the TPCA stadium in Kampung Baru to protest Lee’s statement.
Some among the Umno leaders even urged protestors to bring pen knives into the stadium.
“Eventually the rally was called off due to security reasons… but  then came Operasi Lallang. Lee Kim Sai had left for Australia, but the victims were PAS, DAP and NGO leaders who were detained under the ISA and shipped to Kamunting," he said.
FMT

Chua on Policy Change

Chua makes his case for change

E-mail
By Ken Vin Lek

KUALA LUMPUR: MCA president Dr Chua Soi Lek today laid out the party's stand on the economy: he wants preferential treatment to be based on needs rather than race.
Speaking at the MCA-organised Chinese Economic Congress here, he said the Malaysian Chinese have been and still are loyal citizens who cannot remain globally competitive unless the country heads towards a merit-based direction.
And to make his case for change, he quoted Confucius: “Only the wisest and stupidest of men never change and for one to know what is right and not to do it, is the worst type of cowardice.”

Chua added: "Failure is not an option for the government and we are one with an intent to change for the better and do what is right.”

In his candid speech to the 500-strong crowd, he said, "We must promote a caring society in which the poor must be looked after. It is clear that preferential treatment must be given according to needs rather than race."

Chua also urged Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak to be more flexible in implementing the 30% Bumiputera equity in other sectors of the economy.

"Rather than enforcing the 30% Bumiputera equity requirement across the board, a more flexible system in the form of a margin of preference system should be implemented on a sector-by-sector basis," he said.

Chua said Malaysia is heading towards a knowledge-based economy, and as such entrepreneurs must be given assistance to carry out their business.

Earlier this year, Najib relaxed the 30% Bumiputera equity requirement for initial public offerings when he tabled the 10th Malaysia Plan.

Chua praised the initiative but urged further relaxation of the race-based policy.

On government-linked companies (GLCs), he said, "It is important to open up the companies' board of directors to include more non-Bumiputeras...”

"In Malaysia, GLCs make up nearly 40% of the value of Bursa Malaysia and they dominate the private sector in the economy.”

As such, he urged the GLCs to take a bold step and venture regionally.

Open tender system

Chua also called for greater transparency in the government's tender system.

He said the closed tender system has been associated with corruption and kickbacks and thus compromising the quality of projects in Malaysia.

"By having an open tender system, it will help lower costs besides removing accusations of corruption."

"Public procurements should also be open to all small medium enterprises (SMEs). All SMEs must be given equal access and opportunities. Procurements should not be given based on race or equity requirement," he said.

According to Bank Negara Malaysia, there are about 600,000 SMEs in the country, making up 35% of the GDP.

By doubling their value, SMEs will account for over 50% of the GDP.

Chua also said for the country to achieve accelerated growth, it needs to liberalise its economy.

He cited the oil and gas and telecommunications sector where the multi-national companies have become well established on the global stage.

"Unfortunately, opportunities for SMEs are still limited...opening up this sector (giving SMEs more opportunities) will boost the country's GDP manifold," Chua said.

Calls for more vernacular schools
On scholarhips, Chua praised Najib's decision to offer Public Service Department scholarships to all students obtaining 9A+ in SPM.

However, he urged the prime minister to build more vernacular schools, saying that Mandarin commands a global trade worth US$2.5 trillion a year.

He said Malaysia's share of the global trade accounted for only 2%.

"With more schools generating more vernacular students, we will be able to generate a workforce conversant in Mandarin in order to seize the opportunities offered in the global market," he said.
The Congress in its 12-point declaration at the end of the event echoed Chua's view amid pledging its support for Najib's reform efforts.
MI

Racism in Malaysia

What will they do about racism now?

By Kee Thuan Chye

COMMENT Let’s wait and see what action will be taken against Siti Inshah Mansor, the principal of Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Tunku Abdul Rahman Putra, Kulai, for the racist remarks she allegedly made at the Merdeka celebrations in her school.
The police will be concluding their investigations soon, under Section 504 of the Penal Code. If they have a case, Siti Inshah could be charged with provocation, which carries a maximum imprisonment of two years, a fine or both.

Meanwhile, DAP supremo Lim Kit Siang has called for her to be sacked. MCA president Chua Soi Lek calls for her to be transferred to a desk job and given counselling. How generous of Chua.

If she did what she is said to have done, she should instead be drawn and quartered, like in the good old days. Or have her head put in a cangue – you know, like in the Chinese movies, where the head and hands are locked up within a square wooden contraption.
Or she should be given the Japanese treatment – force-fed water while someone jumps on her bloated tummy, or hung from a tree by her thumbs, and displayed publicly for all to see that this is what happens to racists.

Of course, I’m being facetious, but this must surely be the fantasy of anyone who feels disgusted by any racist act. All the more so if it is committed by someone who is a principal of a school, who should be spreading the message of racial unity instead of – God forbid! – racial hatred.

Siti Inshah is alleged to have said that Chinese students are not needed in the school and can go back to China or Sekolah Foon Yew (a private Chinese school in Johor), and that the prayer strings Indian students wear on their neck and wrist make them look like dogs, and only dogs would be tied this way.

If the allegation is true, what could have possessed her to make her say such things? That is something that must be ascertained. Even if she had been provoked for some reason or other, it is still not her place to react this way to the students. She has a huge responsibility as a school principal to restrain her racist impulses.

Given the seriousness of the situation, if the allegation is true, how then can she be allowed to get away with it? If she were to be exonerated, imagine the damage she could further cause given her influential position.

If it is true that she behaved like a racist, her name should instead be remembered in the Hall of Shame.

Racial slurs

So far, however, among the Barisan Nasional parties, only the MCA and the MIC have criticised the action. Has any Umno leader come out to say anything against it? And if so, why not?

If the people who are in charge of administering it are not up to it, if instead they are exposing the wound to even more bacteria, then we should be looking for an alternative cure.
Siti Inshah is also alleged to have called her non-Malay students penumpang (passengers or tenants) in this country. First, we had Umno politician Ahmad Ismail calling non-Malays pendatang, now there’s penumpang. What will they think up next?

These racial slurs are getting out of hand. And that’s worrisome. It’s symptomatic of the times. We are getting more divided along racial lines than perhaps ever before.

That’s what you get when you allow the mainstream newspapers to go to town scaring the Malays into believing that the non-Malays are a threat and will soon take over the country. When someone like Zaini Hassan can write irresponsibly and mischievously in Utusan Malaysia about a “large-scale war” breaking out that will be bigger than that of May 13, about an alternative constitution being written that will abolish the special position of the Malays and Islam. What rubbish!

That’s what you get when you allow newspapers and individuals to go around telling non-Malays they must be submissive, grateful and not speak up for their rights, or go home – to China or India.

That’s what you get when you allow organisations like Persatuan Pribumi Perkasa Malaysia (Perkasa) to go on their high horse and slam every reasoned argument made against their credo. So now, for every little thing they don’t like, they run to the police station to make a report.

That’s what you get when you give them so much face, to the extent of granting them a publishing permit virtually overnight; when you cut them so much slack by saying nothing when they challenge government policies that seek to address the nation’s fall from economic competitiveness.

And then no less than the Deputy Prime Minister invokes the ghost of May 13, pulling the perennial Umno stunt, to tick off Chua Soi Lek for asking for more non-Malay participation in the economy.

Damoclean sword

Not only is Muhyiddin Yassin behind the times in that regard; he actually warns that this could anger the Malays and it could amount to a spark similar to that which set off May 13. Who is stoking the racial fire here? If a personage like the DPM says it will make the Malays angry, some people might be bound to take that seriously and really feel angered. If the DPM mentions May 13, that might put ideas in some fanatics’ heads.

Why must Muhyiddin say something potentially flammable like this? As the nation’s No 2 leader, he should instead avoid bringing up such a thing instead of brandishing it like a Damoclean sword.

But then, that’s what constitutes the central problem of this country. Politicians will make capital of anything without thinking of its consequences. They are short-term players looking for short-term gains. And this short-term playing has been extended for decades in the sick politicisation of race.

Do we have to keep reminding them of the dangers of this game and still see nothing done about it even when the cows have come home? By then, it will be too late. The wound caused by racial discord might have become so infected that it can no longer heal.

The treatment has to start now. And if the people who are in charge of administering it are not up to it, if instead they are exposing the wound to even more bacteria, then we should be looking for an alternative cure.

Dramatist and journalist Kee Thuan Chye is the author of 'March 8: The Day Malaysia Woke Up'

Heaviest Punishment Demanded

MIC official demands ‘heaviest punishment’ for Johor principal

August 19, 2010
KUALA LUMPUR, Aug 19 —The government must mete out the “heaviest punishment” on Johor school principal Siti Inshah Mansor for allegedly making racial remarks against the Chinese and Indian communities, MIC leader S. Murugessan said.
The MIC central working committee member said he felt personally insulted when the principal supposedly said the Indians looked like “dogs” when they wore their prayer strings, adding that such offensive remarks should stop.
“I am offended and hurt. No one should insult the religious practices of other religions and to say the Indians’ are akin to dogs is really, really insulting,” he told The Malaysian Insider last night.
Murugessan also chastised the principal for telling the Chinese to go back to China, pointing out that the community’s home was Malaysia.
“This is our homeland, so people have to stop resorting to calling us to go back to India, to China. It is not fair and wrong of them to say that our homes are not here,” he said.
He noted that as the school principal, Siti Inshah was holding a position of great responsibility and should not be seen making such intolerable statements.
“It sends a wrong signal to all Malaysians and threatens national unity,” he said.
Murugessan also questioned the nonchalance of Education director-general Tan Sri Alimuddin Mohd Dom for brushing off the incident as a mere misunderstanding and for saying that the fiasco had been duly settled.
“I am perplexed and distressed by his statement. At least 17 reports have been lodged over the matter and numerous students and parents have complained.
“How could all of them have misunderstood?
“How can the matter be considered resolved when we were informed that she (Siti Inshah) is on (now) on leave pending disciplinary action?” he asked.
In an SMS to The Malaysian Insider yesterday, Alimuddin said the incident was just a misunderstanding and had been solved between the principal and the students.
He also denied that the principal had been transferred from Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Tunku Abdul Rahman Putra where she works.
Murugessan said if indeed the issue had been settled, Siti Inshah would be the third such civil servant to be let off the hook with a mere slap on the wrist after making “racially derogatory and outrageous remarks”.
The other two, he said, were schoolteacher Rusita Abu Hassan and Datuk Nasir Safar, the prime minister’s former special officer.
In Rusita’s case, the teacher at SMK Telok Panglima Garang in Banting had in 2008 allegedly used derogatory remarks on a certain ethnic group in order to “test their level of patience”.
She was later transferred from the school but the punishment was viewed as more of a promotion for she was given a post in a smart school located near to her home.
Nasir’s controversy was sparked off in February this year when he allegedly said that the “Indians came to Malaysia as beggars and Chinese, especially women, came to sell their bodies”.
He was later asked to resign as the prime minister’s aide and no further action was taken against him. In Parliament, Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Datuk Seri Nazri Aziz said that this was because it was difficult to prove if Nasir’s words had any tendency to be seditious.
Murugessan said the government should be more proactive in punishing those who made such sensitive remarks in order to deter others from following suit.
“I call upon the prime minister, the education minister and the home minister to thoroughly investigate the matter by bringing upon the heaviest punishment of the law. Mere suspension or transfer will not do,” he said.
The police are currently investigating the case under section 504 of the Penal Code for provocation which carries a maximum imprisonment of two years, a fine or both.
Last Thursday, the principal had reportedly made the derogatory remarks during the launch of the school’s Merdeka celebrations.
“Chinese students are not needed here and can return to China or Foon Yew schools. For the Indian students, the prayer string tied around their neck and wrist makes them look like dogs because only dogs are tied like that,” Siti Inshah was quoted as saying in at least one police report.
State Education Department deputy director Markom Giran has also said that the principal was on leave pending disciplinary action.
The school administration confirmed with The Malaysian Insider that the principal has been leave since yesterday and is expected to be back by Monday.
On Tuesday, Lim Kit Siang called on the government to remove the principal and said that she should be severely punished for the offensive remarks allegedly made during a school assembly.
MI

Punish not Cover Up

Punish ‘racist’ principal, not cover up, parents demand

August 19, 2010
KUALA LUMPUR, Aug 19 — Denying that it was a “misunderstanding”, parents want the Education Ministry to take stern disciplinary action against the Johor school head accused of spouting racist slurs, claiming that it was not the first incident.
One parent even alleged the ministry was trying to “cover up” the case at SMK Tunku Abdul Rahman Putra in Kulai.
“Parents are very unhappy that the authorities are citing misinformation and misunderstanding that the headmistress had made the remarks.
“It wasn’t a misunderstanding. Even the teachers have given their statement to the police. The teachers confirmed what has been reported by the students,” a parent told The Malaysian Insider, refuting Education director-general Tan Sri Alimuddin Mohd Dom’s response yesterday that the case was just a misunderstanding and had been resolved.
“If it was, then why did the state Education Department tell her to make an open apology to the non-Malay students and teachers?” he asked, and related that principal Siti Inshah Mansor had been loudly booed by the student population in the attempt.
“The government is trying to cover it up,” claimed the 46-year-old business consultant, who asked not to be named, fearing repercussions to his job.
The father of two said parents were mulling setting up a formal parent action group to pressure Putrajaya into action.
“Some disciplinary action must be taken. Even if not dismissal, at least demote her. If just transfer her out, it won’t solve the problem.
“She has done in before. In her previous school, she called Indians Nigerians,” he said, claiming Siti Inshah, who was formerly the principal of SMK Kelapa Sawit — another school in the same Kulai district — had been transferred out following similar complaints.
The police are currently investigating the case under section 504 of the Penal Code for provocation which carries a maximum imprisonment of two years, a fine or both.
A total of 17 complaints have been lodged with the police against the principal so far.
A copy of one report made last week and recently put up on the Malaysia-Today website listed several racist and derogatory remarks allegedly made by Siti Inshah, including likening Indian students wearing prayer threads on their person to dogs and ordering dissatisfied ethnic Chinese and Indian students to “return to China or India”.
Part of the lengthy police report lodged by a 16-year-old student alleged: “She gave the example of owning a Proton Saga with two passengers who are Munusamy and Chong. Munusamy and Chong were only passengers. They cannot claim any right to the car. This is the same as Malaysia in which the non-Malay students are passengers.”
Similar “racist” allegations have been reported made by senior civil servants, most notably by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak’s then-political aide Datuk Nasir Safar in January this year at a 1 Malaysia event, and signal a rise in racial tensions among Malaysia’s multicultural society.
MI

On Nazir Razak

Nazir Razak — Tay Tian Yan

August 19, 2010
AUG 19 — Some say if he were not Najib’s brother, he couldn’t have achieved this much today.
But some also say if he were not Najib’s brother, he could have achieved even more.
I have an inclination towards the second saying.
Nazir Razak is the youngest brother of Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak, and the youngest son of the country’s second prime minister Tun Abdul Razak.
Nazir is the chief executive officer of CIMB. About 10 years ago, he was instrumental in the merger between Bank Bumiputra and the Bank of Commerce in what everyone believed was a bailout for the ailing BBMB.
Not many viewed the merged entity’s future with favour. The fiscal conditions of BBMB back then, along with its modus operandi and personnel issues were tacky enough for anyone to fix.
Nazir’s challenge was to transform the government-sponsored bank plagued by a severe lack of competitiveness, rigidity and corruption into a highly efficient, market-oriented and profitable business entity.
Upon taking over the bank, Nazir embarked on a slew of ambitious restructuring policies.
He succeeded in convincing the board to lure elite bankers with attractive remuneration and bring in many non-Bumiputera managers. With the power in his hands, he reorganised the internal operations of the bank, weeded out connections, optimised the businesses and established a set of governance guidelines.
At the same time, he reinvented the bank’s branding position in a bid to reinstate customer confidence. He launched an array of financial services and products to meet the market needs. He even brought the company’s businesses overseas in an ambitious expansion programme.
This erstwhile dying bank has now received a new lease of life over the years, with capitalisation and profit margin both among the country’s top three.
Nazir’s competence is beyond doubt, and the corporate sector generally agrees that he is not merely an outstanding banker, but one of the country’s most capable CEOs too.
But Nazir is more than just a top-rated manager, he is also an initiator and advocate of open and progressive ideas.
He has since Mahathir’s time been making proposals to the government to reform the country’s economic structure, saying that it should further liberalise the economy and implement free market principles while uprooting antiquated and stale policies in a bid to create a more equitable and competitive business environment.
Among his most controversial proposals was the one calling for the abolition of the New Economic Policy.
He argued that the NEP had not helped the Malays in general, but had instead shut the majority of Malays out of the country’s economic activities while denying non-Malays access to the mainstream national economy, jeopardising the country’s overall economic performance in so doing.
His did not make the remarks to please foreign investors or non-Malays. He unapologetically hit out at the NEP during an exclusive interview with Utusan Malaysia some two months ago.
Nazir’s achievements had nothing much to do with his family, upbringing or his Bumiputera status, but his own wisdom and input.
His progressive psyche testifies that the Malays can still get plugged to the world so long as they are willing to deliver themselves out of the “kampung mentality” cocoon.
Some say he makes the most ideal candidate for finance minister, but the prime minister has been reluctant to bring his younger brother into the government or politics.
Having said that, there are voices calling for Nazir to play a bigger role so that he can change the largely conservative mindset of the Malays and help steer the nation towards greater progress. — mysinchew.com
* This is the personal opinion of the writer or the publication. 
The Malaysian Insider.

Cabinet Pimp

Harakahdaily   
PETALING JAYA, Aug 18: M.S. Arjunan, the PKR branch chairman who recently exposed a letter implicating Deputy Federal Territories and Urban Wellbeing Minister M. Saravanan (right), said he had solid evidences, including CCTV recordings, to prove the latter's involvement in prostitution, drugs and gangsterism.
Speaking to the press yesterday, Arjunan, who is the Kampung Tawas PKR branch chairman in Perak, said he had received a letter from one Raman, who claimed his daughter was one of Saravanan's alleged victims.
Arjunan said the girl was a student at the MIC-run Tafe College in Negeri Sembilan between 1998 and 2001.
“In the letter, Raman mentioned that he knew Saravanan and his family background well,” he added.
Arjunan said he had lodged a report against Saravanan with the Brickfields police station on Saturday.
Among others, Arjunan (left) alleged that the MIC member of parliament for Tapah was involved in supplying college students to several VIPs.
"My police report is a response to the written complaint by the father of the victim," he said.
Arjunan further revealed that he had been receiving death threats over his mobile phone following media reports about his exposure.
Saravan had since denied the allegations against him, saying they were "politically motivated".
Challenging Saravanan to sue him for defamation, Arjunan said the evidences were safe with his lawyer.
"I will reveal these evidences when the case is brought to court."
He also lashed out at CID director Mohd Bakri Zinin for concluding that the allegations against the MIC vice president were slanderous.
"Congratulations to Mohd Bakri," he said, and added in jest that Mohd Bakri had solved a case which had been taking place for the last ten years in a matter of three hours.
Arjunan however promised to give full cooperation in any police probe.

Ground Zero Mosque Revolt

Obama faces Democrat revolt over Ground Zero mosque

FOUR days into an intensifying national dispute over plans for a mosque near Ground Zero, Barack Obama has been left isolated by his own party after the refusal of senior Democrats to back the project.
Harry Reid, the Senate Majority Leader and Mr Obama's former mentor in Congress, has broken with the White House by saying that the mosque should be built elsewhere, while David Paterson, the Democratic Governor of New York State, announced last night that he would be meeting the project's developers to discuss alternative sites.
Gleeful Republicans have stepped up attacks on the US President for appearing to bow to the dangerous political currents stirred up by the idea of an Islamic cultural centre two blocks from where the World Trade Centre collapsed after a terrorist attack nine years ago.
Emboldened by polls showing that at least two-thirds of Americans consider the plan an insult to the memory of 9/11's victims, conservatives have likened it to the idea of a swastika being erected next to the Holocaust Museum in New York or a Japanese war memorial at Pearl Harbor. Newt Gingrich, the potential 2012 presidential contender, has gone as far as to argue that there should be no mosque near Ground Zero as long as there are no churches or synagogues in Saudi Arabia.
A growing number of Democrats believe that Mr Obama has only himself to blame. With a total of 43 words, half of them unscripted, he has split his base by intervening where no intervention was required.
It started with a carefully judged line at an Iftar dinner for Muslims at the White House last Friday. Paying tribute to a Muslim winner of the Purple Heart buried in Arlington National Cemetery, he said that every American military veteran shared "the values that we hold dear" and that "one of those values is the freedom to practise your religion - a right that is enshrined in the First Amendment of the Constitution".
The line was seized on by conservatives as an implicit endorsement of the so-called Park 51 project, which is backed by one of America's leading Sufi moderates and would, if built, include a swimming pool and a 500-seat auditorium as well as a mosque.
The following day Mr Obama felt the need to clarify his remarks. His intention was simply to let people know what he thought about equality under the law, he said on a family visit to the Gulf of Mexico. "I was not commenting and I will not comment on the wisdom of making a decision to put a mosque there."
By entering the fray Mr Obama dismayed congressional Democrats in tight midterm races who face majorities who object to an Islamic presence of any kind near what they consider hallowed ground - even though there are already two busy mosques within four blocks of Ground Zero.
"How can this possibly be helpful when feelings are still so raw?" one party strategist asked in The Washington Post yesterday. By attempting to modify his message, he has let down other supporters who saw his first comments as a rare and welcome stand on principle. Republicans have relished the entire spectacle.
Senator Reid is fighting for his political life in Nevada and believes that he cannot afford to equivocate. "The First Amendment protects freedom of religion," a spokesman said. "Senator Reid respects that, but thinks the mosque should be build some place else."
The White House insisted that Mr Obama was untroubled by his loneliness in defence of Muslims' rights to worship and that "he's happy our thriving democracy is continuing to produce vigorous debate".
The Australian

Soi Lek tunjuk belang

Soi Lek beri petunjuk awal MCA

KUALA LUMPUR 17 Ogos - UMNO dan parti komponen Barisan Nasional (BN) diingatkan supaya segera mempersiapkan diri bagi menghadapi kemungkinan MCA bukan lagi sebahagian daripada anggota parti itu pada Pilihan Raya Umum (PRU) Ke-13 nanti.
Ahli Dewan Tertinggi Pertubuhan Pribumi Perkasa Malaysia (Perkasa), Mohd. Zahid Md. Arip berkata, pendirian Presiden MCA, Datuk Seri Dr. Chua Soi Lek bahawa parti itu tidak takut untuk berkongsi pandangan yang sama dengan DAP hanyalah fasa pertama sebelum jalinan lebih 'mesra' dibentuk.
"Walaupun MCA merupakan antara parti teras dalam BN tetapi UMNO dan komponen yang lain perlu bersedia kerana ini (perkongsian pendirian) baru fasa pertama, tidak mustahil pada PRU nanti, Soi Lek akan berkongsi pula wadah perjuangan yang sama dengan DAP," katanya kepada Utusan Malaysia, di sini hari ini.
Beliau mengulas pendirian Soi Lek yang menegaskan bahawa parti itu tidak takut untuk berkongsi pandangan yang sama dengan DAP dalam hal yang boleh memberi keuntungan kepada masyarakat Cina.
Soi Lek memberi alasan, pemimpin UMNO tidak boleh menyalahkan MCA walaupun parti itu mempunyai pandangan berbeza daripada pendirian BN kerana tuntutan yang disuara beliau adalah gambaran kepada keinginan masyarakat Cina.
Mengulas lanjut, Mohd. Zahid menyifatkan Soi Lek sebagai pemimpin MCA yang lupa kepada sejarah kerana terlalu taksub untuk menyaingi sifat cauvanis yang diperjuangkan oleh DAP.
Tegasnya, Soi Lek dan pemimpin MCA yang lain harus sedar bahawa negara ini bukan dibina atas sentimen perkauman sempit tetapi ia terbentuk kerana nilai kejujuran dan perasaan saling menghormati antara pemimpin UMNO, MCA dan MIC yang terdahulu.
"Jangan kerana semata-mata hendak menagih sokongan masyarakat Cina, Soi Lek lupa kepada sejarah. Nilai kejujuran dan saling menghormati hak yang telah dipersetujui inilah yang membolehkan kita hidup dalam keadaan aman selama ini," jelasnya.
Dalam pada itu, beliau turut menyelar sikap Soi Lek yang disifatkannya sebagai sengaja berbuat tidak faham mengenai konsep 1Malaysia, apabila mempertikaikan hak keistimewaan bumiputera selain membangkitkan pelbagai tuntutan yang mengguris hati orang Melayu.
Menurutnya, Soi Lek sepatutnya belajar berterima kasih kepada kerajaan kerana tetap juga mengekalkan jumlah pemimpin MCA dalam Kabinet walaupun parti itu menyebabkan BN kalah teruk dalam PRU Ke-12 yang lalu.
"Inilah sikap cauvanis Soi Lek. Sengaja buat-buat tidak faham mengenai gagasan 1Malaysia tetapi pada masa yang sama lebih berminat untuk mendokong konsep Malaysian Malaysia yang diperjuangkan oleh DAP, sedangkan MCA berada dalam BN," dakwanya.
Utusan Malaysia