Thursday, 26 August 2010

Stop the Charade


Action against Sabah 12: Stop the charade, cry supporters

By FMT Staff

PETALING JAYA: Supporters of 12 Sabah PKR leaders hauled up for disciplinary hearing have slammed the entire exercise as a sham and a waste of time. And they want the party's top leaders to bring an end to this charade.
They fear that if the farce continues, it will only lead to increasing turmoil in the party.
“We are surprised that the party had sent three lightweights to conduct the disciplinary hearing... and it wasn't a proper disciplinary proceeding at all.

“What we saw were these three pro-Anwar leaders interviewing the Sabahans on their alleged role in the formation of a breakaway party last year,” the supporters told FMT, choosing to remain anonymous for fear of further reprisals from the party.

“It appears that no decision will be made by the three committee members as the decision will be made for them by certain leaders in Kuala Lumpur... this is a charade orchestrated from party headquarters,” they alleged.
In a later development, the party's secretary general said today that the disciplinary committee has recommended that the 12 be suspended for a year, with a final decision to be made by the supreme council on Aug 29.

The 12 leaders, all of whom are aligned to PKR vice-president Jeffrey Kitingan, have been subjected to disciplinary proceedings due to their role in setting up Parti Cinta Sabah (PCS) last year.

The idea of the new party was mooted by some Sabah PKR leaders following a massive fallout between Jeffrey and fellow vice-president Azmin Ali, which resulted in Jeffrey being replaced as the state chief.

However, under a peace plan inked by the party headquarters here, Jeffrey was made responsible for both Sabah and Sarawak and another person was put in charge of the state. Azmin was totally removed from the state lineup.

The peace deal also ensured that there will be no witchhunt against those who had allegedly plotted against the party at that time by aligning themselves with Jeffrey.

However, the decision to haul up the 12 before the disciplinary committee suggests that the party is ready to ditch the peace deal and punish the 12.

With their suspension, if confirmed by the supreme council on Sunday, they would play no part in the coming party polls. Their backers have seen this development as an elaborate plan hatched by Azmin and his Sabah loyalists to cut off rivals from the party.

Party supremo Anwar Ibrahim has also been accused of playing a role in this.

A Malay agenda?

“We are tempted to believe what blogger Haris Ibrahim wrote yesterday that Anwar was not keen to have a non-Malay to lead Sabah and Sarawak,” said the supporters of the 12.

“This move against the 12 looks like a new campaign to weed out the influential non-Malays from the party so that Azmin and his boys can have a free rein,” they added.

Yesterday, the disciplinary committee – made up of Animah Ferrer, P Y Wong, and Steven Choong – interviewed 11 of the 12 in Penampang, Sabah. One was absent due to illness.
Political observers noted that this move by PKR has once again put the spotlight on Anwar and the role Sabah and Sarawak will play in Malaysian politics.

FMT learnt that the complaint against the 12 was filed by five PKR members – Sulaiman Aladad, Jonathan Yasin, Dr Hamzah Amir, Dr Roland Chia, and Adris Taripin, all said to be aligned to state leaders close to Azmin.

“Anwar should just come clean and say why these 12 are being investigated in breach of the peace deal.

“His continued silence will only lend credence to talks that he is in the know of the plan to sideline Jeffrey in the party,” they said.

Also read:

Jeffrey's supporters quizzed over breakway bid

'What's the deal with Sabah 12, Anwar?'

'Who will kick Umno out of Anwar?'

FMT

Sarawak Report on Taib


$1 Dollar Mansion?

Wednesday, August 25th, 2010 GMT
1117 Boylston Avenue, Seattle, USA
1117 Boylston Avenue, Seattle, USA
Sarawak Report would like to enquire of Abdul Taib Mahmud how much he paid for the mansion that Samling passed on to his family in Seattle, USA ?
The residence forms an enormous property, standing in its own grounds in one of the most prestigious area of Seattle on Boylston Avenue.  It was passed from a Samling-owned company to a company now owned by Abdul Taib Mahmud and his family, for just one US dollar in 1991.
Click for King County Assessment Office details

Details of a very nice property

City Garden!
Described as a Top Grade Mansion in ‘very good’ condition by Washington State’s King County Department of Assessments, the property was valued at over US$ 6.8 million in 2008.
It has 6 bedrooms and 5 main bathrooms and an enormous total living space of 9,020 square feet, plus a basement of 2,120 square feet.  The house is surrounded by a large open porch and there is a big basement garage  for the car-loving Taib family, plus a second, attached garage.  The mansion is surrounded by gracious gardens, kept in manicured condition and the grounds total 26,172 square feet.
See pictures of Samling properties under http://sarawakreport.org/2010/08/from-samling-to-the-taibs/#1
Click for Home Appraisal Document (1996)’ “The Taib home, located at 1117 Boylston Avenue in the community of Seattle…”

Mysterious acquisition

Lord and Lady of the Manor
The property, registered under the company W. A. Boylston Inc (California), has been in the possession of the Taib family since the early to mid-1990s.  Family portraits of the Chief Minister, his deceased wife and four sons and daughters as small children, adorn the elaborate rooms.
They have all spent time in the mansion, which is not occupied by anyone else.  The property forms part of the family’s Sakti International Corporation, incorporated in California and currently managed by Hisham (Sean) Murray, the Chief Minister’s son in law, out of his offices at 333 Preston Street, Ontario, Canada.
However, there is confusion in the Seattle public records as to how the property passed to the Taibs.  Sarawak Report has been unable to obtain any clear record of the transfer from one owner to another or, importantly, the register of any payment that would normally be eligible for taxation.  We therefore request a statement from the Taibs to explain the situation.
Gracious living

The Samling connection

However, Sarawak Report has managed to clearly establish  that before passing to the Taibs the house was owned by another California corporation called CSY Investments, set up in 1988.  CSY acquired the property in 1991 and then registered it under subsidiary company called W. A. Boylston Inc.
CSY are the initials of Chee S Yaw, who signs himself as the company’s President in documents which are publicly available at the King County Land Registry.  Significantly, Mr Yaw is one of the younger sons of Yaw Teck Seng, founder of the massive logging conglomerate Samling Global.  Yaw Teck Seng is regularly featured in Forbes Asia’s Rich List of Malaysia’s top 40 richest individuals, as does his eldest son, Yaw Chee Ming, establishing them one of the richest families in Asia.
Chee Siew Yaw - Son of Samling Boss

‘Unethical’

Our revelation comes with poor timing for the Chief Minister of Sarawak.  Earlier this week Samling made international headlines when the Norwegian Government Pension Fund withdrew all investments in Samling after condemning the company as ’unethical’, owing to  illegal logging and environmental devastation in Sarawak.  [Click for Norwegian official announcement]
Abdul Taib Mahumd in his joint capacities as Chief Minister, Finance Minister and State Planning and Resources Minister, has controlled the issuing of Sarawak’s timber licenses for the past 30 years, leaving clear questions over his incentives for  favouring such an ‘unethical’ company.
It is no secret that Samling has based its business success on achieving numerous logging concessions in Sarawak. Over the period of the Chief Minister’s rule, companies operating under his licenses have razed virtually all Sarawak’s valuable virgin forest, much of it taken without compensation from the indigenous peoples who had been granted these territories under Native Customary Land Rights.
President of CSY (Son of Samling Boss) signs ownership of Boylston Mansion in 1991. When and how did it pass to the Taibs?
Samling is one of the main companies involved in this destruction and it has used its base in Sarawak to launch similar logging operations in the Congo, Amazon, Russia and elsewhere, many of which have been heavily criticised by concerned NGO’s across the world.

The US $1 Sale

Therefore, we repeat the question, how and why did the Chief Minister come by a mansion formally owned by Samling?  The only official record available of a transfer of the property in the King County Land Registry from CSY is the granting of a so-called Quit Claim Deed for just one dollar!  This transaction on 19th September 1991 placed the property into the subsidiary company W. A. Boylston Inc.  W. A. Boylston had been incorporated in California a few days earlier on September 5th by CSY and its registered address was given as 2260 Douglas Boulevard, Roseville, which was the Headquarters of CSY.
Grandure
CSY and Boylston then immediately filed a joint letter to the King County Real Estate and Excise Tax Department declaring ‘under penalty of perjury’  that W. A. Boylston was a wholly owned subsidiary of CSY Investments, thereby making the Quit Claim transaction exempt from excise tax.
However, our investigations have shown that there is no subsequent record in the Land Registry of the later transfer of ownership of W. A. Boylston from CSY (Samling) to the Taibs.  According to rules published by King County such a transfer would normally require the payment of thousands of dollars of excise tax.

Proof of Taib ownership

Despite the lack of open records, Sarawak Report is able to confirm that there is definitive proof that the Taibs did take over the property from Samling’s CSY.  In fact they took up residence as the effective owners not long after the property was placed in the hands of the CSY subsidiary W. A. Boylston.  Rahman Taib had an insurance assessment drawn up in 1996 (see above).
Portraits of the Taib family adorn the house. The family were in residence from at least the mid-90s
Furthermore, a significant alteration was made to the company’s official address and official representative in 2000. In that year W. A. Boylston’s annual Statement by a Domestic Stock Corporation to the State of California noted a change of address to that of the headquarters of Sakti International (the property company, which Sarawak Report has recently proved to be majority owned by the Chief Minister).  Likewise, the company representative was altered from a CSY official to Rahman Taib, the Chief Minister’s younger son.

How much did it cost?

Sarawak Report therefore wishes to ask once more,whether Mr Taib paid the going rate of over $3 million for the house at that time to Samling for the purchase of the house?  If so, how did the Chief Minister (salary approx MR 50,000 per month) find the money?
If, on the other hand he acquired it for free, then readers of Sarawak Report will be entitled to conclude that the mansion was a kickback from Samling, as a favour in return for all the logging concessions granted to them by the Chief Minister.   They would also be entitled to ask whether the United States tax authorities have received all the money they are due.

Mansion No 2 – 2222 Everett Avenue, Seattle

By the way there is a second Seattle Mansion!

If the Boylston mansion was indeed a ‘gift’ from Samling to the Chief Minister, then one cannot expect such a thing to be done by halves.  Indeed, a second, equally gracious and prestigious mansion has also found its way from the Yaws to the Taibs in Seattle, by what would appear to be exactly the same route.

W. A. Everett Inc

2222 Everett Avenue East, worth $2,854,000 at its peak value in 2008,  was also originally purchased by the Yaws. It was  then registered under another California corporation, W. A. Everett Inc, set up on the same day as W. A. Boylston (5th September 1991). W. A. Everett Inc is likewise listed as a subsidiary of CSY in the King County Land Registry.   This mansion also ended up in the hands of the Taibs.
Choice view - Seattle Sky Line
The property is smaller with four bedrooms and bathrooms, but has famously sought after views over the City.
Sarawak Report understands that the Taibs have mainly rented it out over the past two decades, but as with Boylston, the only information about a transfer of ownership of the company from Samling to the Taibs comes with an identical change of address and officers in 2000, from the CSY address in Roseville to Rahman Taib, at Sakti International’s Headquarters in San Francisco. This leaves very many questions about how the Taibs have acquired their wealth.  It  is time for transparency.

FELDA lost in Federal Court

Felda settlers get RM11m in damages

August 26, 2010
PUTRAJAYA, Aug 26 — More than 300 settlers will receive RM11 million in damages after the Federal Court here rejected the Federal Land Development Authority’s bid to overturn a lower court decision which found that Felda had manipulated the grading of palm oil from their plantations.
Today’s victory could pave the way for more suits and underscores the rising discontent in Felda settlements — and may cost the ruling Barisan Nasional (BN) crucial support from the mostly-Malay settlers.
Pakatan Rakyat (PR) parties like PAS have taken advantage of the unhappiness in Felda settlements and have been campaigning in recent months to rally settlers, traditionally BN voters, to the side of the federal opposition.
The Federal Court refused a review of Felda’s application today to challenge a decision by another panel in dismissing its appeal, citing that it had no jurisdiction to entertain the application.
Felda had filed an application to review a Federal Court decision on January 19 which denied the land authority leave to appeal against a decision by the Kota Baru High Court.
The High Court had previously ordered Felda to pay RM7.8 million in damages and interest to the settlers on January 13, 2008, after its counsel failed to turn up for the hearing of the suit filed by the settlers.
The decision was subsequently upheld by the Court of Appeal.
The amount has since ballooned to RM11 million with accumulated interest, with each settler now expected to be paid between RM20,000 and RM30,000 in damages.
Today’s ruling was decided by a three-man panel chaired by Court of Appeal Justice Alauddin Mohd Sherif with Federal Court judges Justice Hashim Yusoff and Justice Md Raus Sharif.
In an unanimous decision, Alauddin said the court did not have jurisdiction to review the earlier decision of the Federal Court.
“Hence, this review is dismissed,” said Alauddin.
This is the first suit filed by the settlers against Felda.
The ruling today is set to have adverse repercussions for the land authority as well confidence of Felda settlers nationwide towards the Najib administration.
This was highlighted by Felda counsel Firoz Hussein Ahmad Jamaluddin, who referred to a string of suits faced by the federal authority from its settlers. There are currently other similar suits filed in the Johor Baru High Court and Seremban High Court.
The settlers sued Felda in 2002 seeking between RM20,000 and RM30,000 each in general damages, claiming that the agency had understated the quality of their oil palm fruits during the period from 1996 to 2002 which caused them to suffer losses.
They named Felda, Felda Kemahang 3 manager Ibrahim Ismail (now deceased) and Felda Palm Industries Sdn Bhd as defendants.
In their writ, the settlers claimed that they discovered fraud and conspiracy in the transactions of the oil palm fruits in September 2001.
More than 150 settlers packed the Palace of Justice here today.
The settlers were represented by a team of lawyers led by Wan Rohimi Wan Daud.
MI

Wednesday, 25 August 2010

Kelantan Oil Royalty Lawsuit

KOTA BHARU, Aug 25:  Kelantan State Petroleum Royalty Claims committee chairman Husam Musa said the state government would file a lawsuit against national oil corporation Petronas for breaching contract on the petroleum royalty on August 30 in Kuala Lumpur.
“The summons writ will be presented to the State Executive Council meeting for approval. If it is approved, the lawsuit will be filed against Petronas on August 30," he said, adding that lawyer Tommy Thomas would file the suit on behalf of Kelantan.
According to Husam, the initial plan was to file the suit on August 31 in conjunction with Merdeka, but had to be changed due to public holiday.
Husam explained that Kelantan’s oil royalty suit was different from a similar suit in 200 by then PAS-led Terengganu state government, because this time around, it is being backed by an affidavit by former Petronas chairman Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah, who has expressed his willingness to testify in court.
"Although the royalty claim case is being brought to the court, the room for negotiation to solve the issue is still open.
"With Ramadan upon us, it is the best time for the parties involved to pay the oil royalties to Kelantan,” said Husam, who also chairs the state Exco on Economic Planning, Finance and Welfare.
Last March, the Kelantan state assembly unanimously gave the state government mandate to take any action, including legal, to claim petroleum royalty as stated in the Petroleum Development Act 1975.
Prime Minister Najib Razak has however ignored the requests, arguing that the Federal government would maintain the "compassionate fund" instead of the oil royalty.
Last May, the Federal government paid RM20 million in such funds, bypassing the Kelantan state government.
Harakah Daily
NB.Latest. The lawsuit will be filed on 30th August 2010 at 9.30 am at the High Court Dagang Jalan Duta Kuala Lumpur.

The Spirit of Ramadan

purpose driven life and finish well"–Lee Kuan Yew

Aug
25
August 25, 2010

It’s Ramadan, So Stop The Scam and Release The Innocent!

by Din Merican
Starting with the press conference by YB Salahuddin Ayub, Member of Parliament for Kubang Kerian, who also sits as an independent member in the MACC Special Committee on Corruption, Malaysians were informed that the MACC had failed in its duty to stamp out real corruption.
Fighting Real Corruption means Going after the Real Crooks
Fighting real corruption means going for the real crooks. Real crooks mean those who have been identified by a specialist law enforcement agency to have committed multiple crimes in the plundering of our nation’s asset. YB Salahuddin called on the MACC, particularly its Chief Commissioner Dato’ Abu Kassim, to explain why he had refused to investigate the complicity of the Police and the A-G Chambers in closing the case against Tajudin Ramli, Malaysia Airlines (MAS) former Chairman, who was once touted to be the New Economic Policy’s  (NEP) Great White Hope (or is it Pahlawan Melayu?).
YB Salahuddin Ayub is the Lone Voice in chiding MACC
What is most glaring is that YB Salahuddin Ayub appears to be the lone voice in chiding the MACC and Abu Kassim for its failures. What, may we ask, is the role and views of the other members of the 5 Panels which were established to give MACC some semblance of transparency? There are 12 distinguished Tan Sri,s Dato Seris and what not titled persons in the Advisory Panel including a former Chief Justice, and yet not a single whine nor whimper is heard from them. Tan Sri Ramon Navaratnam and Tan Sri Robert Phang who sit in yet another of that 5 Panels and who are always portrayed as roaring lions have suddenly become purring pussycats. Why are they so muted? Their silence is deafening!

What makes it so nauseating is that only during the recent 15th Malaysian Law Conference, Dato’ Abu Kassim had made a pledge that he would resign if it can be shown that the MACC has failed to investigate any report against any big fish or Cabinet Ministers. By big fish, presumably he is referring to someone powerful or something big. Abu Kassim was being boastful because just at the same time as that law conference, AG Gani was seen strutting in the court’s corridors in Putrajaya to chargeTun Dr Lin Liong Sik for the PKFZ scandal. Now that’s a big fish. Is it?
Or was that just a public relations spin by APCO to show Abu Kassim as a serious corruption buster. To show that the Najib government has the political will to stamp out crimes and corruption. To show that the Rakyat’s aspiration will be fulfilled. Indeed, it was all just a show. If it was not, then how come Abu Kassim has declined to investigate the MAS scandal, whereas in value, the MAS scandal which happened earlier would be bigger  than PKFZ because RM 8 billion was worth a lot then than now.
Dato Ramli Yusuff is made a victim instead
What makes it so disappointing is that Dato’ Seri Idris Jala, CEO of Pemandu and Minister for the Government Transformation Plan (GTP) has been going around in APCO-organised road shows with Abu Kassim to deliver this message of change to the Malaysian public. It is  revolting that Idris Jala was once the MD of MAS who had full knowledge of this scam, and yet he did nothing when the MACC declined to investigate and prosecute Tajuddin. It is nauseating when Idis Jala knew all this and yet he allowed the MACC to prosecute Dato’ Ramli Yusuff, then Director CCID, who became a victim in this scam. All this unfolded in Raja Petra Kamarudin’s  (RPK)  Malaysia Today.
Since last week, RPK’s Malaysia Today has been making daily exposes of the scam to plunder the national airlines MAS. Thus far, RPK has exposed that Tajudin Ramli was not such an NEP genius after all. He was just a common thief, no different from a bank teller who puts his fingers in the till, except that in Tajudin’s case it was no small amount. It was RM 8 billion! Tajudin plundered MAS to the point of bankruptcy through a web of deceit by placing his cohorts in strategic places within MAS.
When the plunder was complete,Tajudin made the government buy MAS back from him for RM8 when the market price was just RM4. That was not too difficult to do using tax payers and PETRONAS money. By then Tajudin had already committed MAS to award  a 10-year ground handling contract to a supposedly German company called ACL GmbH with fixed tonnage guaranteed. When MAS tried to break off the contract, Tajudin sued MAS in Switzerland for Euro 63 million (RM 300 million).
Lawyer Rosli Dahlan and Dato Ramli  Yusuff landed in hot soup
Lawyer Rosli Dahlan entered the scene and pursued civil and criminal actions against Tajudin. He had full support from MAS senior management in Dr Mohammadon (fondly called Dr Don) and Dato’ JJ Ong. He had full support from the MAS MD Dato Seri Idris Jala. He had full support from the MAS Board of Directors which included Dato’ Anwar Zaini.
With all these support, or so Rosli thought, he sought the assistance of his old time friend Dato’ Ramli Yusuff, a seasoned and serious crime buster who was then the Director of Commercial Crimes. Ramli had achieved fame in the 1970’s for solving the murder case of Jean Pereira which was recently turned into a documentary by National Geographic crime series. Since then, Ramli had a string of successes until his “misfortune” to have saved Anwar Ibrahim from being bludgeoned by then IGP Tan Sri Rahim Noor in the famed Black Eye Incident. Musa Hassan, who was Ramli’s subordinate, achieved fame as the Mattress Carrier, and rose to be IGP. Ramli was instead thrown into exile in Sabah and was cold storaged.
Even in that wilderness, Ramli achieved more fame when he eradicated Sabah of its long standing problems with illegal immigrants from Philippines and Kalimantan, Indonesia. What he did not realize nor care for was that in eradicating these illegal immigrants, he was disturbing an UMNO electorate reserve base. What Ramli failed to consider was that the BN government through Biro Tatanegara (BTN) had issued Malaysian NRICs to these illegal immigrants to vote for BN during elections!
So again, Ramli had landed himself in a hot soup. To cover it up, several Immigration, Ministry of Home Affairs officers and local Sabah chieftains were detained and made scape goats under ISA. One of them, Datu Akjan, is known to me, and proudly brags that he had done national service by serving time under detention for a national cause. In appreciation, the Ministry awarded him a contract to build Police barracks in Melinsung, Papar. Imagine this, an ISA detainee being awarded a construction contract to build police barracks! Don’t be surprised if an ex-convict is awarded a contract to build prisons. This is Malaysia and Semua Boleh!
For that, Ramli was recalled to the Peninsular. But one thing he brought back which would be his good luck charm later was Dato’ Anita Harun, his Sabah born wife. Anita is a Sessions Court Judge in KL and was sent to exile in Ipoh when Dato’ Ramli was charged in 2007 as she was seen accompanying him to court, just like any good wife would do. The things they do to an innocent man and his family.
Prime Minister Abdullah Badawi was fully briefed on MAS situation
RPK’s expose also showed that Dato’ Ramli was so bold as to disagree with AG Gani’s decision not to prosecute Tajudin. With all the support  mentioned earlier, both lawyer Rosli and Dato’ Ramli thought they were on safe ground, terra firma, and went as far as to brief the Prime Minister Tun Abdullah Badawi. What both did not realize was that Pak Lah had planted his mole into the MAS Board of Directors, Dato’ Anwar Zaini, former Chairman of Bernama, to elicit all information on the goings on in MAS.
The briefing and written report that Dato’ Ramli handed in to PM Abdullah Badawi would be his death warrant. Pak Lah had other reasons too. He could not afford an investigator of Dato’ Ramli’s calibre  to expose that his family company, Fahim Capital Sdn Bhd and Brahims LSG Sky Chefs Holdings, were also party to the plundering of MAS by having favorable contracts to them but unfavorable to MAS. That’s a clean guy for you.
By transposing his family’s interest to UMNO’s interest, it became clear to UMNO that Dato’ Ramli is not the kind of bumiputra that could serve their purpose. After all, he was a Kelantanese, like Tengku Razaliegh and Zaid Ibrahim, all having that uncontrolled “gedebe” characteristics. No Kelantanese can be allowed to become PM or IGP. So Ramli had to be brought down. For defending Ramli, Rosli was also brought down in a most uncouth brutal way. That part of the charges against Ramli and Rosli have been explained in earlier postings.
RPK also disclosed that while Ramli was taken out of the equation, and despite the charge made against Rosli, the criminal actions against Tajudin were still pursued. In the letters that YB Salahuddin Ayub exposed in his press conference, the firm Lee Hishammuddin Allen & Gledill was seen issuing strongly worded reprimands to the MACC for exposing the MAS report to CCID PDRM. It is to Dato’ Seri Hishammudin’s credit that a legal firm that still bears his name is acting so fearlessly against Tajudin and MACC. Could this be sanctioned by Hishammuddin? Or is it that Rosli is still behind the scene pursuing his brand of justice. I say that because the strong reprimands are Rosli’s trademarks. He would call a spade a spade. In Ramli’s letter to AG Gani, which was earlier posted by RPK during the Goh  Cheng Poh@ Tengku Goh incident, Ramli was seen as chiding the AG for “abdicating his constitutional duties” in refusing to prepare affidavits for CCID which forced Rosli to act for the CCID.
When I spoke to Ramli in court, he indicated that AG Gani knew those were Rosli’s words and thus the brutalities that befell Rosli during Ramadan of 2007. It appears that Rosli would not mince his words against those whom he perceives to have transgressed the law, and that is his downfall in this case.
MACC’s Abu Kassim
Utimately, RPK has exposed that the MACC Chief Abu Kassim is a man who cannot keep his word if he does not resign. To borrow Martin Jalleh’s expression, MACC committed suicide the day Dato’ Razak Musa, MACC Head of Prosecution, demonstrated to Dr Pornthip Rojanasunand  that it was possible to die of  “self strangulation”. Last night was the 15th night of Ramadan and Muslims start to recite the Doa’ Qunut during Terawih. In that prayer, there is a verse that says “ Verily! You impose punishment on those to be punished….and thus please save us from punishment O Merciful Lord”.
If Abu Kassim had performed his terawih last night, he would remember that verse. He should then accept that with the exposure by RPK, it is a message from God that Abu Kassim must fulfill his pledge or he be punished for breaking a vow. But no, please don’t misunderstand me as saying that RPK is God’s messenger.
Truth must prevail
All I am saying is that the voices of truth need not come from the hallowed prayer halls of the mosque only. The voices of truth is within us if we only take pains to hear it. In this holy month of Ramadan, when the syaitans and djinns have been chained by God, the only evils abound are the evils within us. It would be evil to let Rosli Dahlan to face trial during the last three days of Ramadan as if to remind him what they did the last time during Ramadan 2007. He should be allowed to contemplate Lailatul Qadr. He should be release from this trumped up charge immediately!